Natural Resources

Environmental Balance, Stewardship, and Sustainability Group

June 26, 2003

Group Participants
Bert Cohen
Zelita Morgan
Skye Maher
Susan McClure
Robin Najer
Deborah Simone
Barbara McMillan
Marc Stettner
Jane Porter
Leigh Dunkelberger
Robert Layton
David Burdick
Pam Hall
Peter Loughlin
Robert Keeney

Dave Cohen, Facilitator

Executive Summary

The significant importance of “public input” during the current revision of Portsmouth’s Master Plan has been brought to an elevated level with the Portsmouth Listens Study Circles. As the Natural Resource - Environmental Balance, Stewardship, and Sustainability group of this citywide planning effort, we were given an empowering opportunity to participate in “Making Portsmouth the Best Place to Live and Work for Everyone.”

Of the major themes or issues highlighted during Portsmouth Listens, Phase I, there was a clear directive to preserve, protect, enhance, and sustain our natural resources and open spaces and incorporate wise environmental practices into this stewardship. As a result, in Phase II, our group, the Natural Resources, Environmental Balance, Stewardship, and Sustainability Group was created to further deliberate this key area.

To identify major issues, comments relevant to environmental balance, stewardship, and sustainability contained in all the Phase I Study Circle Reports were tabulated according to their subject or theme, e.g., water issues, wetlands, recreation, etc. The most prevalent theme was the preservation and conservation of undeveloped property, i.e. an open space.

There were also numerous comments from Phase I participants on the concept of sustainability. Therefore, as a group, we firmly believe that the City should increase awareness of this issue both to City government and citizens and integrate sustainability principles into the City’s decision making processes. Ultimately, we encourage the City to adopt a sustainability framework to guide future development, programs and projects.

In every environmental topic (open space, water, pollution, etc.) throughout Phase I and Phase II, there was a common theme of a need for citizen involvement in the City’s planning process. To emphasize the importance of this issue, our Phase II group strongly believes the incorporation of ongoing citizen input into future City decision-making through the establishment of Citizen Committee groups is necessary. It is envisioned that the involvement of these Citizen Committee Groups would continue throughout the implementation of the City’s Master Plan.

The sequence of the sections of our Phase II report was based on the relative importance of the natural resource - environmental balance, stewardship, and sustainability issues in the Phase I Study Circle Reports. The most significant topics based on the number of comments from Phase I, such as "open space policy" and "water issues and wetlands" have been listed first. A discussion, as well as goals and actions have been presented for each of these key issues.

1. Sustainability Framework
2. Open Space
3. Water Issues and Wetlands
4. Waterfront
5. Pollution: noise, air, light
6. Recreation / Parks
7. Sustainable Landscaping
8. Green Practices - Green Infrastructure
9. Recycling / Composting

1. Sustainability Framework

We recommend inserting a Sustainability Framework into the City of Portsmouth Master Plan. We envision the Master Plan as an opportunity to share our communities’ deepest values, values that have impact on each of us, as well as future generations.

Goals:

We want to ensure that we as a community are progressing toward creating healthy natural resources, vibrant cultural communities and balanced economic development.

In order to achieve these goals, we recommend adopting a framework, such as The Natural Step, by Karl Henrick Robert. This framework of The Natural Step has four system conditions:

  • Nature cannot "take: (i.e. withstand) a systematic buildup of dispersed matter mined from the Earth's crust (e. g., lead, mercury, oil, etc.).

    Example of Applicability: when the City purchases or replaces vehicles, give preference to efficient, alternative fueled vehicles.

  • Nature cannot "take" (i.e. withstand) a systematic buildup of persistent compounds made by humans (e. g., DDT, PCBs, etc.).

    Example of Applicability: In any proposed landscape plan, consideration be given to water consumption, planting of native species and use of plants which do not require heavy fertilization or pesticide use.

  • Nature cannot take a systematic deterioration of its capacity for renewal (e.g., harvesting fish faster than they can replenish, converting fertile land to desert).

    Example of Applicability: Portsmouth will support policies which help to protect and regenerate our estuaries.

  • Therefore, if we want life to continue, we must (a) be efficient in our use of resources and (b) promote justice - because ignoring poverty will lead the poor, for short-term survival, to destroy resources that the earth and its living systems need for long-term survival (e.g., the animal communities as well as the rainforests).

    Example of Applicability: Identify parts of the City where mixed income residents, mixed use and cluster housing would be appropriate, and zone that land accordingly.

    Including these system conditions in our master plan will give us direction not only on how we should develop, but it will also give us an opportunity to have a common language to talk across all disciplines, from business to education to civic society.

    Action:

    We recommend the creation of an Educational Forum with the mission of fostering the necessary dialogue to deepen our understanding of sustainability and how it can be implemented in our City.

    There are members of the Natural Resources and Sustainability Committee who are anxious to join with others to support the development of this forum. Creation of the Forum would be accomplished by building on the foundation which Portsmouth Listens has so effectively established.

    Comments from Phase I – pertaining to a “sustainability framework”

    Group 8

  • City to become a leader in environmental issues, supporting biking and other clean transport, green construction, alternate energy sources.

  • Have long range plan that looks to the health of our water, soil and air.

  • Raise public awareness of long range issues.

  • See problem in context of proper governance area (regional, state, national).

    Group 5

  • Plan for our future as a living dynamic human beings, as an essential component of urban planning

  • This community is served by addressing its need threefold: as a dynamic organism with a human environment, a natural environment, a built environment are honored individually and kept in delicate balance to the whole.

  • We encourage the City of Portsmouth, and its regulatory and enforcement agencies to continuously monitor and maintain a balance between these 3 environments, particularly as city government creates and executes public policy.

    Group 12

  • Our main objective (in terms of management growth) is to ensure that future growth and development proceeds in a thoughtful and environmentally sensitive manner, aimed at fostering a reeling of community among the residents and visitors.

    Group 18

  • Take cares of the natural (air, water, etc) and built environment and promote sound, clean, green design of spatial environments.

    All Groups

  • All groups offered specific suggestions to improve the natural resources in Portsmouth. The number of specifics are too great to list here.

    2. Open Space

    The identification, creation, preservation/conservation, and beautification of open space are key issues to the citizens of Portsmouth. Population growth and sprawling development are consuming both our natural resources and community character. At the present time, New Hampshire is the fastest growing state in the northeast. The population has more than doubled since 1950 and is projected to grow another third from 2000 to 2020.1 Eighty-five percent of this growth will occur in the southeastern third of the state.2 In order to preserve the quality of life and the uniqueness of our community, the City of Portsmouth should strive for a balance between smart growth and smart conservation and should commit efforts for open space protection/preservation.

    In order to pro-actively protect open space and our quality of life, the City should:

    1. Establish an Open Space Committee
    2. Develop an Open Space Policy

    Open Space Committee

    The formation of an Open Space committee is crucial to the implementation of an Open Space policy. This citizens group should work with the Environmental Planner, conservation commission, planning board, local land trusts and interested citizens to focus and coordinate land protection efforts. It is anticipated that the establishment of this committee will lead to further commitment to open space issues in the City and formal adoption of smart growth principles. The committee would oversee the development and implementation of an Open Space policy. In addition to these goals the Committee should be:

  • actively involved in the Planning Board review process of any plans to develop/redevelop open space (including land owned by the City) to ensure public open space is preserved to the greatest extent possible.

  • actively involved in all plans for commercial use of open space to minimize urban sprawl and balance open/undeveloped to developed/paved land.

    Open Space Policy

    In recognition of the development pressures the City faces now and anticipates facing in the future, having an Open Space Policy will set the tone for smart growth rather than uncontrolled development. It is hoped that having a plan that identifies areas targeted for conservation will enable the planning board and conservation commission to make informed decisions that are consistent with the Open Space Policy. The Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forest has developed an initiative entitled New Hampshire Everlasting which is an outstanding guide for land and resource protection. We have taken several of the ideas presented in that document and adopted them here.

    Goals:

    The Open Space Policy should incorporate the adoption of the following goals:

    1. Conservation of at least twenty-five percent of land within city boundaries for a network of conservation land and parks. (current estimates show that the City has approx. ten percent of it’s land in conservation)

    2. Conservation of Lands That Support Our Quality of Life

    3. Conservation of Habitat for Native Species

    4. Conservation of Lands that Keep our Water Clean3

    To achieve these goals, conservation of lands that provide the following should be considered as priorities:

  • scenic beauty and community character

  • recreational and commuter trail network

  • clean drinking water

  • city parks and outdoor recreation fields

  • wildlife habitat conservation areas

  • connections between existing or potential green space

  • areas subject to tides and adjacent uplands (estuaries and landward buffers)

  • habitat for native umbrella species such as Atlantic white cedar

  • improvement of wetland values by conserving adjacent non-wetland areas that impact how wetlands function in the areas of water quality enhancement and protection, drinking water recharge, support of fish and wildlife, support of biodiversity, habitat for threatened and endangered species, and flood protection . For example, by conserving a tract of land between two large wetlands, we save habitat that is critical to wetland function and values. A real world example is the Great Bog where development on uplands would negatively impact the functions (and values) of the Bog.

  • locally produced food

  • areas that were identified under the current Master Plan

    Because we are in an urban area, the Open Space Policy should broadly interpret open and green spaces. The policy should include lands that are smaller in size such as pocket parks in the downtown areas or formal parks that may be public or semi-private. The policy should also extend to municipal development such as the Post Office block and the library.

    Actions for City/Committee to implement plan

  • Establish and commit to City adoption of a policy of conservation of least 25% of City land for conservation and parks.

  • Identify and prioritize all existing open space areas in the City by an established and publicized timeline. (perhaps 1 year)

  • Produce build-out maps of developable areas.

  • Create a fund for purchase of open space land by passing an open space bond, voluntary City tax, or implementing a City initiative to “purchase and plant a tree” with proceeds to the open space land fund.

  • Adopt a policy to limit impervious surfaces in the City on a watershed basis so that runoff pollution from nonpoint sources does not degrade our open/green spaces or water quality. There are several watersheds in the City and each should have a set goal depending on the character of the area. For example, downtown may be able to have 20% impervious and continue to function as it has or even improve, thanks to upgrades in sewer infrastructure, but increasing the impervious surface cover to just 10% in the Berry Brook watershed may be disastrous.

  • Adopt appropriate density overlay districts for drinking water lands, aquifers, and buffer areas. Adopt regulations that require clustering development away from lands that are critical to water quality such as lands identified by the DES as “drinking-water protection area” and lands with sand and gravel aquifers.

  • Consider increasing the buffer zone along major wetlands and shorelines to 300 feet or establish a policy to purchase conservation easements within these buffer zones.

  • All future development and redevelopment must consider plans for thoughtful inclusion of open and green space that sould serve to benefit those living an working at the site as well as the casual visitor. Lands currently managed as open space to serve the public need to be replaced if developed for different purposes. Encourage partnerships or adoption initiatives for local businesses to restore degraded wetland areas and beautify visible open space.

  • Reducing sprawl should be considered in any future development/redevelopment plans.

  • Encourage partnerships or adoption initiatives for local businesses to restore degraded wetland areas and beautify visible open space.

  • Create stewardship plans for existing conservation lands

  • Develop, maintain and link “green space” throughout the City to create a community trail system similar to Derry, NH Pathways project. For example, parklands should be established around the Community Campus off West Road and linked to downtown with a green trail. Plan, develop, and fund and implement a riverfront walkway from downtown to Spinnaker Point.

  • Complete existing plans and implementation of the currently planned “river walk” in the downtown area in accordance with a publicized timeline.

  • Purchase land to create a public open space /bike path parallel to McDonough Street from Maplewood Street to Bartlett Street along the North Mill Pond.

  • Ensure no additional development on City land surrounding South Mill Pond, but instead develop the area into a town green/meeting place by building a gazebo, adding park benches, and possibly linking the South Mill Pond with Prescott Park (as described above).

  • Review current zoning around desired conservation areas.

  • Strive to incorporate these goals to the Pease Trade Port and other consortiums that involve the City and its resources.

    Comments from Phase I – pertaining to a “Open Space”

    General / Zoning

    Groups 4,7,9, 13, 16, 19

    Identify, create, and conserve (i.e. an Open Space Policy)

    Groups 5,10,12, 25

    Control and limit commercial sprawl, Rte 1 south is beginning to look like Saugus MA

    Group 3

    Maintain and beautify open space and parks

    Group 3,12

    City to buy land and create open space/recreational areas

    Group 22

    “Mission statement – support the preservation and rehabilitation of the City’s open space”

    No more city land sold for development

    Preserve what is left of the open space in downtown

    Establish an Environmental Impact Review Board

    Master Plan include section on environmental preservation

    Group 24

    Encourage minimal impact development, reduce sprawl and preserve natural resources

    Group 25

    Portsmouth is loosing its small town or hometown feel. It seems that every open space is taken up by businesses rather than housing or parks.

    Groups 4,8,16

    New construction/redevelopment – requirement included for green space

    Group 4

    City to consider creating open/park space surrounding Community Campus

    Develop more community parks and gardens – encourage partnership or adoption initiatives

    Commit as a City and community to ongoing open space protection – invest in creative solutions

    Group 5

    Balance ratio of open/undeveloped to developed/paved

    Group 14

    Balance open spaces and population housing density

    Group 9,12

    Improve access and expand green space and limit building size

    Group 9, 19

    Create a map of green space and perform a resource and needs assessments

    Group 10, 19

    Provide strict review of ordinances related to open space and parks

    Group 10

    More interaction city residents and Planning Board

    Groups 14, 16

    Develop, maintain and link “green spots” throughout the city-from small pocket parks to large gardens; a community trail system (16) like the Derry NH Pathways Project that will also provide an alternative transportation network

    Group 19

    Look at “cluster zoning” to maximize green space

    Funding

    Groups 4,12, 19

    Identify, develop, fund land conservation plan to preserve and add green space – float bond for open space protection

    Group 8

    Help support green space with a development tax

    Group 14

    Develop a funding mechanism for the Conservation Commission so they can quickly capitalize on open lands, such as a check box on tax bills to direct monies to the commission.

    Site specific

    Group 24

    Purchase Lady Isle for public use

    Group 8

    Develop South Mill Pond into town green

    Group 10

    Renegotiate Osprey Landing, commercial green space to be used for small-size housing and park area

    Group 12

    Lafayette Road – Open spaces, are we cautious enough in the strip commercial zoning and development of Lafayette Road

    Group 3

    Urban Forestry/Sagamore Creek Area remain undeveloped

    Groups 5,7, 20, 24

    Develop a Riverfront Walkway; from downtown to Spinnaker Point; create river walk

    3. Water Issues and Wetlands

    Portsmouth’s valuable water resources provide tremendous enjoyment and opportunities for residents, businesses, and visitors. From commercial or recreational fishing and boating to swimming and claming, planned convenient access to our waterways as well as protection of our water quality and wetlands is essential to the heart of Portsmouth.

    As Seacoast New Hampshire grows at an increasing pace, Portsmouth waterways are negatively impacted by continued development within the Portsmouth and surrounding communities. To ensure water quality and quantity, impacts must be assessed for all future development activities including the unregulated pollution from stormwater runoff, as well as the regulated sources of water pollution. Although our freshwater wetlands are now protected by a 100-foot buffer, they continue to be divided and impacted by development, reducing water quality and wildlife habitat. The Little Harbor / Back Channel area appears healthy and provides beautiful vistas and the North and South Mill Ponds, have been cleaned up dramatically in the last decade through the efforts of many volunteers, the city of Portsmouth, and state organizations. Although clean-up as well as protection efforts continue, these coastal embayments are constantly challenged by development and pollution.

    Nonpoint source pollution is transported with stormwater runoff and dumping from surrounding development, as well as historic causes. New development (e.g., Tucker’s Cove, Mill Pond Way) and redevelopment (e.g., Pierce Island) add new pollution sources, and sewage continues to enter the South Mill Pond and Piscataqua River from combined sewer overflows. Therefore, private activities continue to require oversight so that their impacts to public resources are minimized. Furthermore, public access to our waterways should be carefully planned to reduce human impacts to water quality and wildlife habitat while creating a safe and fun place to work, live, and play.

    Goals:

    1. To ensure both the quantity and quality of our City drinking water supply

    2. To continue to upgrade its wastewater treatment facilities and pump stations

    3. To continue efforts to limit combined sewer overflow to minimize impacts to our waterways.

    4. To preserve our precious seacoast environment through strict enforcement of wetlands protection

    5. To place priority not only on providing new public access to the cities’ valuable water resources and preserving and enhancing existing public access

    6. To consider public access opportunities when selecting preservation or conservation properties especially when development will restrict existing waterfront access

    7. To continue to address and expand current efforts to improve the water quality of the North and South Ponds by fully supporting the organizations and individuals involved in cleanup and restoration efforts.

    Actions:

    Water Quality and Supply

  • Evaluate the current and future drinking water needs of the City and surrounding communities based on current rate of population growth and water use.

  • Manage stormwater both in terms of infrastructure needs, water resources protection, and groundwater recharge by adopting a stormwater management ordinance which is then referenced in Portsmouth’s site plan review and subdivisions regulations.

  • Work with neighboring towns and communities that impact the quality and quantity of our current drinking water supplies by becoming actively involved in any decision making that involves potential impacts on water quality and quantity.

  • Continue to evaluate areas or neighborhoods that need upgrades to their water distribution systems to improve water quality or pressure by canvassing neighborhoods.

  • Evaluate the need for and consider alternate water supplies well in advance of anticipated need.

    Wastewater

  • Continue to inform the public regarding the status of the upgrades and progress of improvements to the current waste water treatment systems and combined sewer over flow projects via public meetings.

  • Report to the public quarterly regarding the frequency, volume, and contaminant loading, of any discharges to wetlands or water ways.

  • Provide and publicize a timeline and be accountable for completion of current wastewater improvement and CSO projects.

  • Devise a plan to preserve, protect, and restore wetlands, creeks, rivers, salt marshes and other tidal or fresh water areas that may have been or continue to be impacted by waste water or CSO discharge.

    Wetlands

  • Provide closer public scrutiny of property development and use within the buffer zone.

  • Hold developers/home owners accountable to mitigate wetland loss and restore wetlands that to achieve no-net loss of wetlands.

  • Investigate and limit or mitigate point or nonpoint discharges to wetlands, ponds, creeks, rivers, or salt marshes.

  • Educate the community and our children to increase awareness of the value of the wetland plants and animals/benthic populations via mailings or public meetings.

  • Restore or protect natural tidal flow in all estuaries.

  • Re-evaluate zoning pertaining to wetlands, preserved land, and open space.

  • Support active preservation and restoration of wetlands, including fresh water systems such as: ponds, creeks, rivers, and riparian habitats, and salt water systems such as: salt marshes, mudflats and shell beds, sea grass meadows and algal beds.

    Water Access

  • On waterfront properties, i.e., Pierce Island, North and South Mill Ponds, provide marked, landscaped, bordered, mulched, and maintained walking trails on frequented city properties to avoid wearing down vegetation and causing erosion on unmarked trails.

  • For boat access, provide convenient and low impact boat launches and docks using the latest technology for minimum impact on water quality, i.e., impervious surfaces for ramps, boat docks that create habitat for shellfish.

  • For walking access to the water, provide marked steps to avoid erosion and vegetation loss in popular areas.

    Point and Nonpoint Source Pollution

  • Wherever possible, use Low Impact Development techniques for new and existing development to minimize the impact on the City’s water quality and to encourage water infiltration to groundwater through alternative non-pervious surfaces for parking areas etc.

  • For all city projects, provide a comprehensive evaluation of water quality or quantity impacts and incorporate the latest technology using state, federal, and local financial (grants) and informational resources whenever possible.

  • Work with communities surrounding Portsmouth within watersheds that impact the City’s waters to partner evaluating their effects on the water and on education and outreach efforts to reduce nonpoint source pollution.

  • Provide education to residents and visitors to the City regarding nonpoint source pollution and how they can make a difference as part of the new Phase II of the EPA Federal Stormwater requirements on public education.

    North and South Mill Ponds

  • Continue and expand efforts to provide support (especially financial) to the existing advocacy organizations for the ponds. i.e., the North Mill Pond Cleanup and the Hodgson Brook Watershed Study.

  • Assist in restoration and protection efforts to reduce causes of water pollution within watersheds of these ponds.

  • Evaluate effects of Pease development on North Mill Pond’s watershed and implement lower impact development, whenever possible.

  • Continue to work on separating combined sewage overflows (CSOs) leading into the South Mill Pond.

    Comments from Phase I - pertaining to “Water Issues and Wetlands”

    Groups 2,5

    Improve sewage treatment including point and non point sources

    Group 2

    Protect access to water for commercial fisherman

    Take control of State Pier

    Appoint committee to focus on waterfront/marine environment issues

    Group 8

    Prioritize health of our water, soil, and air – long range plan

    Work with government to manage pollution outside of Portsmouth

    Group 19

    We want protection of our watershed and our water sources, the city needs to upgrade the water supply, water distribution, and waste treatment facilities to ensure the highest quality

    Group 24

    Keep dam at South Mill Pond open year round, remove unnecessary fencing in South Mill Pond area

    Group 24

    Support North Mill Pond cleanup and create public access areas

    Group 5

    Restore, protect, and preserve tidal flow in all estuaries

    Re-establish natural tidal flow

    Group 5, 8

    Support active preservation and restoration of North and South Mill Ponds

    Group 10

    Revision of zoning pertaining to wetlands

    Preserve, protect, and restore ponds, creeks, rivers and wetlands

    Group 24

    Restore and protect salt marshes and other natural areas

    4. Waterfront

    One of Portsmouth’s most valuable resources is its waterfront. The roots of this community were based on fishing, whaling and merchant trade years ago. Portsmouth’s water resources provide many opportunities for residents, businesses, and visitors alike. The waterfront is actively used today as in the past for commercial and recreational fishing and boating, swimming, and whale watching. Planned convenient access to the waterfront is essential to the heart of what Portsmouth is today.

    Goals:

    Priority needs to be placed not only on providing new public access to the City’s valuable water resources but also on preserving and enhancing existing public access. The City of Portsmouth should preserve the commercial and public access to the waterfront, while maintaining conservation measures to protect this natural resource.

    Actions:

    All new waterfront construction or improvement projects should involve the citizens input by either the formation of a Portsmouth Residents committee or a public comment period prior to and after initial planning. Focus should concentrate around the following:

  • Public Ownership - Purchase, when available, private waterfront land and convert it to public spaces.

  • Water Views - Preserve and increase public viewing areas of Portsmouth Harbor and the Piscataqua River. Building ordinances should be passed to limit, restrict or remove walls and fences on private waterfront land which impede the viewing of Harbor and River from public areas, roadways and sidewalks. There is currently not enough publicly owned, water viewing points in the downtown area in the vicinity of Bow Street and Ceres St. The viewing / sitting area on Ceres St. should be covered to allow use in rainy or poor weather conditions and expanded, if possible.

  • Waterfront Industry - Preserve the working waterfront. The Marine Commerce and Industry provides character to the downtown area as well as providing jobs to local residents. The Commercial Fishermen's Co-Op, Merchant Marine industry (Shipping, Tugboats, etc), and Port Operations should be maintained. The City should look to carefully balance waterfront industry with public access and use. Private waterfront industry should allow public access where ever possible.

  • New Waterfront Construction & Maintenance - Maintain a historic theme with new waterfront construction. Maintain waterfront piers, wharfs, and bridges to avoid creating a visual eye sore (rusting bridges and broken piers). Several bridges are in need of repair and painting. Maintain a well landscaped waterfront. Provide marked paths along waterfront areas to minimize erosion.

    Comments from Phase I - pertaining to “Waterfront”

    Group 2

    Increase public ownership

    Group 2, 19

    Protect and enhance/preserve: access/views to bogs, wetlands, marshes, rivers, and tidal ponds

    Group 3

    Preserve public viewing and encourage additional viewing points

    Limit development around

    Group 24

    Preserve public harbor access whenever possible

    Group 5

    Make shoreline protection a priority and make more accessible.

    Group 6

    More accessible waterways for non-motorized movement

    Preserve natural resources, wildlife recreation, waterfront

    Group 10, 22

    Support commerce and industry that insures the port continues to be a working port, maintain the working port.

    Group 10

    Retain public access – “Accessibility to the waterfront is very important.”

    Group 15

    Existing river views in downtown should be preserved and opportunities sought to add more or enhance existing ones

    Group 14

    Pierce Island – ensure that any development is related to marine use, the area should be kept as public space rather than allowing commercial development. An example of allowable development might be for small boat use such as a city marina.

    Group 15

    Its diverse components need careful supervision to balance business, industry, and public – private interests. Could a better boat facility be built at Pierce Island?

    5. Pollution: Noise, Air, and Light, and Visual Pollution and Litter

    Noise pollution

    This is a quality of life concern, which can also negatively impact the health and well-being of those continually awakened or otherwise disturbed by excessive noise. City ordinances on noise control [Article IV] and the Zoning Ordinance [Article V, Section 10-505] describe impermissible noise levels for various city districts, at different times of day and night, as determined by sound pressure measurement equipment. Would these ordinances be adequate if rigorously enforced, or do they need revision? Enforcement will depend to a large degree upon monitoring by citizens, as well as City enforcement of the regulations.

    Goal:

    Determine if current ordinances are adequate to control noise pollution.

    Actions:

  • Establish a committee of concerned citizens, with representation from the enforcement community, to evaluate the adequacy of the current noise ordinances, to advocate for amendments to them if necessary, and to improve enforcement.

    Air pollution

    Air quality is extremely poor in Portsmouth. It negatively impacts the health of the citizens and natural habitats of our City, as well as the atmosphere of our planet. Greenhouse gases are well-established contributors to global warming. Like other population concentrations along the northeastern seaboard and across the nation, our air quality has been given a rating of “F,” the worst possible rating, by monitoring organizations. A major component of this rating is sulfur dioxide, which originates from smokestacks of power plants, both locally and to the west. Auto emissions, chiefly hydrocarbons, are another important source of pollution. Improvements will require efforts on both local and national front. Tobacco smoke, also a hazard to health, is an important source of indoor pollution, and is not uniformly prohibited in Portsmouth restaurants and nightspots.

    Goal:

    To work towards improving air quality of the NH Seacoast region.

    Actions:

  • Pass a city ordinance prohibiting smoking in all Portsmouth restaurants and nightspots (* this issue was not agreed upon by all participants).

  • Synchronize traffic lights to minimize the time cars idle at red lights.

  • Require the City to replace old vehicles with the least polluting (and most energy efficient) models available.

  • Develop ways for the municipality and its citizens to work towards more effective federal legislation and regulation of pollution from all sources (including power plants, factories, and automobiles), since air pollution does not respect political boundaries.

    Light Pollution

    Light pollution in Portsmouth has been largely overlooked. This is perhaps because the public has been conditioned to believe that “more light” is always better and is essential for the public safety and for the success of commercial enterprise. However, excessive and misdirected lighting installed by businesses, private property owners and the municipality 1) have a negative impact on the quality of human and natural life, 2) can create hazardous driving conditions because of glare, and 3) waste not only tax revenues through excessive power usage but also the resources required to generate this power. The City’s Zoning Ordinance contains only minimal reference to light pollution. (see below). The state-produced Technical Bulletin #16 provides useful background information and model light pollution ordinances. Cities as large as Tucson, Arizona and nearby Kennebunkport, Maine has enacted light pollution ordinances which may serve as models. Individuals instrumental in promoting the passage of that ordinance might also be enlisted to help a Portsmouth citizens’ task force. The New Hampshire Citizens for Responsible Lighting and other organizations advocating control of light pollution can also provide guidance to the City.

    Goal:

    Develop a comprehensive light pollution ordinance for the City of Portsmouth.

    Action:

  • Appoint a citizens’ task force to review lighting in Portsmouth, to study measures adopted in other cities, and to make recommendations for a light pollution ordinance for the City.

    Zoning ordinance Article V-10-511 Exterior Lights A: The source of exterior lighting shall not be arranged in such a manner as to be objectionable to adjacent properties or create a hazard on public ways and B Outside lights must be made up of a light source and reflector so that, acting together, the light beam is controlled and not directed across a property line so as to constitute a nuisance.

    Site review regulations require that information be provided about the proposed location and type of lighting for outdoor facilities..

    Visual Pollution and Litter

    Concerns about various forms of visual pollution and litter were also cited by several of the study groups and effect the way the City is perceived by its citizens and tourists.

    Goal:

    Consider the scenic beauty of Portsmouth in a comprehensive manner during City decision making.

    Actions:

  • Implement more judicious placement of signs and sign poles. Re-examine the regulations in Article IX of the city ordinances to ascertain their adequacy and whether they are being observed and enforced.

  • Place utility poles and lines underground, if possible. This is mandatory now for new developments, but is considered by the Public Works Department cost-prohibitive for the rest of the City at present. (A cost of $400,000 was estimated for Gates Street alone.) Nevertheless, new technologies and a more robust economy may make possible serious consideration of this desirable goal in the future.

  • Schedule downtown trash pickup for early morning or late evening, so trash doesn’t litter sidewalks.

  • Add services such as more recycling and ample trash bins.

  • Remove graffiti.

  • Enforce the dog excrement ordinance.

  • Provide dog litter bag dispensers and waste containers in all parks

    Comments from Phase I – pertaining to “Pollution: Noise, Air, and Light, and Visual Pollution and Litter”

    Noise Pollution

    Groups 4, 8

    More rigorously enforce current ordinances

    Group 4

    Install noise barriers along Route 1 bypass

    Group 1

    Turn down the music.

    Air Pollution

    Group 19

    Reduce pollution from the power plant.

    Group 10

    Consider making downtown smoke-free.

    Light Pollution

    Group12

    Require businesses to use lighting designed to limit light pollution.

    Group 15

    Light pollution is a growing concern, primarily from commercial establishments. The city ought to adopt and enforce strict regulations regarding “light trespass” from commercial establishments into the public right of way, and against lighting fixtures that aim or allow light to escape upward into the night sky. There are national and international reference sources for information on this topic; the city should appoint a volunteer task force to review the situation in Portsmouth and make recommendations. The worst offenders are auto dealerships, but many other businesses’ ‘security lighting’ in which parking lots or rear entryways are brightly illuminated with unshielded floodlights are common. An egregious example is the recently privately installed ‘street’ lighting (in addition to the pre-existing security lighting” in the lot behind the Blockbuster Video/Cleary’s Cleaners Building that send glare all the way across the Islington Street/Barrett St. Intersection. A clear comparison between bad and good are the Sunoco and Mobil stations on Islington Street, whose canopy lighting cast glare into and even across the street, and the Irving gas station down on Route 1, whose recessed canopy lighting illuminates only the area below it. The light intensity of many internally illuminated signs is also a problem.

    Adopt and enforce strict regulations regarding “light trespass” and against lighting fixtures that aim or allow light to escape upward into the night sky.

    Appoint a municipal task force to review the situation in Portsmouth and make recommendations.

    Group12:

    Require businesses to use lighting designed to limit light pollution.

    Group 15:

    Light pollution is a growing concern, primarily from commercial establishments. The city ought to adopt and enforce strict regulations regarding “light trespass” from commercial establishments into the public right of way, and against lighting fixtures that aim or allow light to escape upward into the night sky. There are national and international reference sources for information on this topic; the city should appoint a volunteer task force to review the situation in Portsmouth and make recommendations. The worst offenders are auto dealerships, but many other businesses’ ‘security lighting’ in which parking lots or rear entryways are brightly illuminated with unshielded floodlights are common. An egregious example is the recently privately installed ‘street’ lighting (in addition to the pre-existing security lighting” in the lot behind the Blockbuster Video/Cleary’s Cleaners Building that send glare all the way across the Islington Street/Barrett St. Intersection. A clear comparison between bad and good are the Sunoco and Mobil stations on Islington Street, whose canopy lighting cast glare into and even across the street, and the Irving gas station down on Rt 1, whose recessed canopy lighting illuminates only the area below it. The light intensity of many internally illuminated signs is also a problem.

    Visual Pollution and Litter

    Group 1

    Pick up litter

    Group 10

    Schedule downtown trash pickup to early AM or late PM so trash doesn’t litter sidewalks.

    Group 15

    Visual clutter from utility poles, lines, and signage. City should be more judicial in placement of additional signs and sign poles, make an effort to consolidate.

    Group 24

    Add services to keep the city center clean by adding more recycling and ample trash bins, and remove graffiti.

    6. Recreation / Parks

    Recreation is a vital aspect of City life. Many recreational opportunities currently exist in the City of Portsmouth.

    Goal:

    The City should continue to plan for new recreational areas, as well as expand and/or improve existing recreational facilities. All new construction or improvement projects should involve citizen input by either the formation of a Portsmouth Residents committee or a public comment period prior to and after initial planning.

    Actions:

  • Physical Sports - Increase the number of public ball fields and tennis and basketball courts throughout the City. Pease should be considered as a location for future ball fields. Expand and improve existing ball fields and facilities.

  • Pierce Island Boat Launching Facility - This is the only public boat/watercraft deepwater launching facility for Portsmouth residents and is vital for access to the city’s water resources. The current launching ramp is dangerous and difficult to use. These safety concerns were identified in the previous Master Plan. The City needs to add two to four finger piers to enable boaters to tie up their boat, temporarily, while parking their car and trailer. It is currently not possible for one person to safely launch a boat. A separate pier should be provided for the safe loading and unloading of passengers and items. The facility should be accessible at all stages of the tides and all seasons for launching and recovery of boats and watercraft. Existing riprap should be repositioned on either side of the ramp to minimize the current. The parking lot needs improvements. The launching ramp should be re-built with a non-skid surface to allow safe access, prevent erosion, and decrease parking lot runoff. A permanent public restroom with showers should be constructed. Boat Launching Facility Improvement funds can be obtained by the purchase of a yearly launching ramp sticker for the vessel & vehicle. Vessel launching size should be restricted to under 35' to prevent damage to the pier unless a special one time, supervised, use permit is obtained. Non-residents should be required to pay per launch. An open Citizens Committee should be formed to involve the public during planning and implementation of the needed upgrades.

  • Pierce Island - The City should consider an area next to the Launching ramp to create a city-owned Marina with boat slips and a Charter Boat Row for small Charter Boats for Hire. The city-owned Marina should prioritize providing slips and services to Portsmouth Residents first. Additional landscaping (trees, bushes, etc) and sitting areas and benches (shaded and open) should be added and maintained.

  • Previous Master Plan Recreation Issues.- All outstanding issues and guidelines from the previous Master plan should be incorporated into the Recreation section of this Master plan.

    Comments from Phase I - pertaining to “Recreation/Parks”

    Groups 5,11

    Continue support of public recreational areas – public river access and boat launches

    Group 13

    Dog park - make more sanitary and stiffer penalties for those who don’t pick up

    Group 22

    More dog parks

    Pierce Island to be preserved

    Group 3

    Increase number of affordable ball fields and tennis courts

    Group 7

    Pierce Island - move municipal boat launch

    Group 9

    Provide responsible recreation (preserve /use Great Bog & upgrade/expand recreational facilities

    Group 10

    Need for increased public recreation areas – Pease and old DPW off Islington could be recreation area

    Support of gym and basketball court at Spinnaker Point

    Group 20

    Pierce Island – improve for better recreation

    Group 8

    Parks in places where people will congregate

    Group 24

    Add sitting areas and pocket parks where pedestrians can meet or rest

    Preserve and support Prescott Park programs and other activities now existing

    Group 23

    Create and maintain current parks

    7. Sustainable Landscaping

    The City should develop a Landscape Management Plan (LMP) that includes principles and practices of sustainability. This LMP should guide the City as well as citizens / businesses when new and old projects are considered for “greenscaping”. This LMP should incorporate the following elements so that it sets forth a vision that will provide aesthetics, ecological habitat, energy and water conservation, and fit into a larger greenway framework. Above all, citizen input should be included as the Plan evolves.

    Goal:

    Hire a part-time or full-time position to develop and administer the Landscape Management Plan and Tree Management Plan, and additional duties as applies to landscaping, community gardening, and park management with the City’s Recreation Department.

    Actions:

  • Instill a “greenery ethic” through a healthy and sustainable landscape. A sustainable landscape is one that is ecologically healthy, economically viable and contributes to human cultural experience (see Appendix for specific details of a sustainable landscape).

  • Enhance and beautify the city gateways, downtown, and neighborhoods through a landscape plan that encourages planting trees, flowers, and shrubs, with priority made to use native species.

  • Create a community planting program that gives groups/businesses seed money to plant/garden. Dedicate $1,000.00 annually for a “Portsmouth Plants” small-grant program that awards five grants of $250 to business or community organizations for purchasing plants and materials.

  • Identify the major thoroughfares of the City, and ensure that they have vegetation/buffers.

  • Ensure ongoing priority for trees in the City. Create a Tree Management Plan that includes: 1) identification of sites for future plantings (along Congress and Islington Street), 2) a ratio of trees to buildings, and 3) monitoring and health assessment of existing trees. See Appendix for Tree tips.

  • Establish sustainable landscaping criteria (recommended / required) for developers, businesses, city departments, and residents to encourage native plantings, preferential use of local materials, water conservation, and minimized fertilizers and pesticides. Educate through a flyer/brochure or workshop.

  • Require new developments to meet minimum landscaping requirements to add natural habitat and ecological value while minimizing the “paving over” phenomena. Encourage developers to have innovative design guidelines that include landscaping and orientation.

  • Consult with Clotilla Straus on existing plans (Pierce Island Invasive Removal Program) for reference and ideas, and consider re-instating the “Curbing Program” which encouraged more grass/reduction of concrete on streets (Wybird Street). Costs were split 50:50 by the owner and City.

  • Identify existing parks that would benefit from demonstration sites of sustainable landscaping practices such as native plants, xeriscaping, etc. with plants labeled as such, coordinate with Portsmouth Gardening clubs and residents who may provide expertise as well as labor and ongoing maintenance.

    Comments from Phase I - pertaining to “Landscaping”

    Group 1

    Plant flowers

    Group 3

    The gateways to the city (landscaping, trees flowers)

    Group 4

    Trees to be planted along Congress and Islington Street

    Group 4

    Beautify neighborhoods and parks by creating and implementing landscape/greenway plan

    Group 5,13

    Plant more trees when developing and refurbishing neighborhoods

    Group 6

    Plant trees and shrubs around mall parking lots

    Group 13

    Create a community garden

    Group 9

    Use green techniques minimizing fertilizer and pesticides

    Group 15

    Tree Management plan and Landscaping as a priority, there are large expanses of asphalt, encourage greenery as an ethic instead of barren concrete

    Group 19, 20

    Have a ratio of trees to buildings; plant trees throughout the city

    Group 19

    Create buffers/vegetation on major thoroughfares

    Group 19

    “Paving Over” – change how the City works with developers and national chains in order to limit indiscriminate paving over of large areas

    Group 21

    New developments should have innovative design guidelines that include landscaping and orientation

    8. “Green” City/Business Practices - Green Infrastructure

    Research has afforded us the capacity to engineer and design buildings and systems that are sustainable and use a “life cycle perspective”.

    Goal:

    The City of Portsmouth should strive to develop, promote, and implement sustainable business practices, as well as sustainable buildings. The implementation of sustainable building practices relies on an integrated process starting with policies and programming for a new project and leading to operations, maintenance, and new policies for the occupied building.

    Actions:

  • Municipal buildings: The City should conduct an inventory of its current buildings to assess its levels of energy efficiency, waste streams, purchasing standards (both products and supplier/manufacturer), furniture, flooring materials, paints, equipment, etc. Results from this inventory will be the basis for future choices of alternative products, policies, and programs that are healthier for building inhabitants and the environment. Ultimately, the City should adopt “environmental preferable purchasing standards” and also incorporate pollution prevention and resource conservation ethics.

  • New Developments (Commercial/Residential): The City should be involved with the development practices used in both commercial and residential projects. These practices should model the concept of Minimum Impact Development (MID) which addresses site intent, site selection/design, building design, construction, and operation/maintenance. The City should consult with the New Hampshire Minimum Impact Development Partnership who has developed a MID Tool kit that includes a list of practices. www.nhmid.org.

  • Adoption of sustainable building practices: These practices should be included in all building construction projects, whether it is a small retrofit, major renovation, or new construction. Establish a set of goals such as: 1) buildings made of enduring materials which need the least maintenance, 2) energy efficient systems and components, 3) long term value for money spent, from selection of materials, to quality of workmanship, 4) consider life cycle such as where/how materials made, and ultimate disposal, and 5) materials that are made from recycled products and are clean (not emitting harmful chemicals such as volatile organic compounds in paints). Consult with resources such as Environmental Building News (www.BuildingGreen.com) and Environmental Design and Construction Online (www.edcmag.com)

  • Energy Efficiency: Portsmouth should set a goal to reduce the amount of coal electricity bought and become an energy-wise community. This of course is easier to measure for city-owned buildings versus private, but the distinction can be made. To meet this goal, the City should: 1) implement an education program that encourages energy conscious practices such as turning off indoor lights and equipment at night or after hours or installing motion sensors on outdoor lights and 2) using alternative energy sources such as solar panels.

  • Consider The 10% Challenge, a voluntary program, begun in Burlington, Vermont to raise public awareness about global climate change and to encourage households and businesses to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by at least 10 percent. Wherever you may live, households and businesses are invited to sign-up, accept the challenge, and begin taking actions today!

  • Encourage LEED certification: For all construction projects in Portsmouth, encourage the use of the LEED Rating System certification. Encourage all pertinent groups such as developers, contractors, realtors, and architects to go to a workshop on LEED and/or become LEED certified.

    Comments from Phase I - pertaining to “Green Building Practices”

    Group 14

    Development/Commercial – 1) Offer incentives for commercial buildings to be environmentally friendly – require “green” standards in municipal buildings and new development, 2) in new commercial, insist on green space as well as residential to encourage “mini neighborhoods”, 3) review existing zoning and commercial development to include multi-use – green space.

    Group 13

    Green Building practices should be adopted, see page 38 for the description

    Group 18

    Portsmouth should become leader by incorporating energy efficient practices in all facets of City business and promoting alternative, non-polluting sources for energy and transportation; promote sound/clean/green design of spatial environments

    Group 19

    City should adopt environmentally sustainable practices in all its endeavors, and we are in favor of the green Portsmouth Library

    Group 20

    Encourage “LEED” certified buildings

    9. Recycling & Composting:

    In addition to saving the City on disposal costs associated with tipping fees, recycling has many benefits including the saving of our limited natural resources, reduction of energy needs and of water in the manufacture of goods, reduction of emissions that may contribute to the greenhouse effect, and the saving of valuable space in landfills. Following are items for consideration:

    Goal:

    We recommend that a major emphasis be placed on recycling in the City.

    Actions:

  • Develop and follow through on an educational program which will encourage recycling and inform the public about the benefits of recycling.

  • Keep informed on current and implement new methods of recycling.

  • As new markets become available, review existing and new contracts to expand the list of materials to be recycled.

  • Provide opportunities to recycle citywide both residential (multi-unit housing) and commercial.

  • Consider “pay per bag” for refuse collection thus encouraging more recycling, waste reduction and composting.

  • Place recycling bins in public areas.

  • Establish an on-site municipal composting of yard wastes and make product available for use by residents.

  • Promote backyard composting through backyard compost bin sales (already available) and education programs.

  • Continue to support the Solid Waste Coordinator position with the public works department.

  • Provide reliable and consistent curbside pickup of corrugated cardboard (OCC) for residents and businesses (especially downtown).

  • Consider partnering with neighboring communities to provide a coordinated year round drop-off facility for household hazardous waste.

    Comments from Phase I – pertaining to a “Recycling and Composting”

    Group 5

    Implement downtown recycling with collection baskets

    Group 8

    Develop new ways to recycle

    Group 10

    Recycle efforts city-wide

    Group 14, 20,

    Mandate and enforce recycling throughout the city – residential as well as commercial; expand the list of recyclables; consider alternative systems such as “pay per bag” for refuse collection that would encourage more recycling, waste reduction and composting (Seattle model); place recycling bins in downtown next to trash bins; and institute year-round compost pickup (see page 18 for remaining) Review the City-wide exemptions – the exemption of a commercial or residential who has existing private contract for pickup is a shortcoming, there is a lack of “curbside” services in condominiums/apt.

    Appendix

    Benefits of Trees

    The urban forest provides us with many long-term environmental, social and economic benefits:

    A single large tree can release up to 400 gallons of water into the atmosphere each day.

    Tree foliage filters dust and and can help remove toxic pollutants from the atmosphere. The foliage captures and removes a wide range of smog-producing compounds such as ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, airborne ammonia and some sulphur dioxide.

    Tees help to cool and freshen the air we breathe. Not only do they moderate the air temperature, but through photosynthesis, their leaves take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen for us to breath. A single, fully grown sycamore tree can transform 26 pounds of carbon dioxide into life-giving oxygen every year.

    Trees reflect our natural heritage and provide a sense of place.

    Tees improve our aesthetic environment, absorb noise, are traffic calming, reduce stress and crime, and create a peaceful place to relax or socialize.

    Trees intercept rainwater aiding soil absorption for gradual release into streams; preventing flooding, filtering toxins, and extending water availability into dry months when it’s most needed.

    Trees cleanse ground water as it filters through their root systems.

    Both urban and rural forests are home to a wealth of wildlife which depends on trees for survival; providing shelter, nesting material and fruits, nuts, and flowers.

    Trees improve property values. The addition of trees can increase property values by 10 – 20%.

    Water from roots is drawn up to the leaves where it evaporates. The conversion from water to gas absorbs huge amounts of heat cooling hot city air.

    Trees help offset the "heat island" effect resulting from too much glass and concrete. Urban neighborhoods with mature trees can be up to 11 degrees cooler in summer heat than those without trees.

    Trees and shrubs slow down rainwater, helping runoff to soak into the soil at a slow and even rate, relieving the pressure on our storm sewers and allowing for the renewal of ground water.

    One acre of trees produces enough oxygen for 18 people every day.

    One acre of trees absorbs enough carbon dioxide per year to match that emitted by driving a car 26,000 miles.

    40% of prescripition drugs dispensed in the U.S. have active ingredients derived from plants, animals

    or microorganisms, many of them from forests.

    By preserving and protecting trees on private property, on our streets and in our parks, we will

    continue to help renew and enhance our urban forest for future generations.

    Community Organizations Dedicated to Trees and Urban and Rural Forests:

    Appalachian Mountain Club
    http://www.outdoors.org/
    Appalachian Mountain Club
    5 Joy St.
    Boston, MA 02108
    Tel: (617) 523-0636, Fax: (617) 523-0722

    Audubon Society of New Hampshire
    http://www.nhaudubon.org/
    3 Silk Farm Road
    Concord, New Hampshire 03301
    Tel: (603) 224-9909, Fax: (603) 226-0902

    National Tree Trust
    http://www.nationaltreetrust.org/
    1120 G Street NW, Suite 770 • Washington DC 20005
    Tel: (202) 628-8733, Fax (202) 628-8735

    Nature Conservancy, New Hampshire Field Office
    http://nature.org/
    22 Bridge Street, 4th Floor
    Concord, New Hampshire 03301
    Tel:(603) 224-5853

    New Hampshire Division of Forests and Lands
    http://www.nhdfl.org/
    PO Box 1856
    Concord, New Hampshire 03302-1856
    Tel: (603) 271-2114, Fax: (603) 271-6488
    Urban Forestry Center
    45 Elwyn Road, Portsmouth
    N.H. 03801-5701
    Tel: (603) 431-6774

    New Hampshire Natural Heritage Inventory
    http://www.nhdfl.org/formgt/nhiweb/index.htm
    PO Box 1856
    172 Pembroke Road, Concord, NH 03302-1856
    Tel: (603) 271-3623, Fax (603) 271-2629

    Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests
    http://www.spnhf.org/
    54 Portsmouth Street
    Concord, New Hampshire 03301
    Tel: (603) 224-9945, Fax: (603) 228-0423

    Tree City, USA – National Arbor Day Foundation Program
    http://www.arborday.org/programs/TreeCityUSA.html
    100 Arbor Avenue
    Nebraska City, NE  68410
    Tel: (402) 474-5655

    UNH Cooperative Extension Ecological Reserve System Project
    http://ceinfo.unh.edu/forestry/documents/nhecosrv.htm#CON_Uss
    214 Nesmith Hall, 131 Main Street, Durham, NH 03824
    Tel: (603) 862-4277, Fax: (603) 862-0107

    LANDSCAPE PRACTICES

    Moving from Conventional Landscape

    >>>>>

    To a More Sustainable Landscape

    Designs disconnected from natural systems >>>> Design based on native ecosystems

    Low biodiversity >>>>> High biodiversity

    Indiscriminate use of exotic materials >>>>> Preferential use of native materials

    Dominance of high maintenance lawn areas (mowing, raking, liming, fertilizing, irrigating, aerating, amending, applying pesticides, dethatching, overseeding) >>>> Reduced lawn areas, utilizing more sustainable practice

    Reliance on pesticides >>>>> Integrated pest management

    Rapid water collection and conveyance >>>>> Water detention, infiltration, and filtration

    Overuse of impervious surfaces >>>>> Preferential use of permeable surfaces

    Soil degradation (erosion, loss of organic matter, compaction, pollution) >>>>> Soil conservation and restoration

    Removal of organic matter (lawn clippings, leaves) >>>>> On-site conservation of organic matter (mulching of leaves, grass clippings)

    Reliance on high-input bark mulch >>>>> Use of groundcovers and other natural mulches

    Degradation of vegetation & soils during construction >>>>> Stringent protection of existing vegetation & soils during construction

    Reliance on rock salt for snow & ice removal >>>>> Reduction in reliance on rock salt by use of low-impact substitutes

    “One size fits all” landscape >>>>> Strong sense of place

    Some Characteristics of a Sustainable Landscape

  • Biological diversity of plants, animals and other organisms that are appropriate to site-specific conditions (soil type and moisture levels, exposure to sun, slope) and that enrich the surrounding ecosystem structure and function.

  • Conservation of plants and animals through:

    - the use of endemic plant community models;

    - relocation of plant materials threatened by land development;

    - use of plant species which are adapted to the region, cold hardy and rugged, with particular emphasis on the use of natives;

    - sound management of exotic plant and animal species which are aggressively invasive;

    - minimal site disturbance during new installations and preferential re-use of existing plant materials; and

    - careful selection, siting, and proper installation of new plant material, including proper after-care, to reduce such problems as transplant shock, long-term stress, on-going maintenance, and mortality.

  • A minimum of high-maintenance lawn areas, hence reduced mowing, raking, liming, fertilization, irrigation, aeration, soil amendments, pesticide application, etc. Reduction in lawn areas will reduce costs while increasing biodiversity, water infiltration and aesthetic interest.

  • Reliance on integrated pest management to maintain pest species at low levels with minimal pesticide use.

  • Identification of the sustainable landscape with sense of place and ensuring a commitment and respect for the qualities that encompass and signify New Hampshire.

  • Low use of toxic and/or hazardous materials, and lower use of chemicals, petroleum products and fuels in general in the landscape design, construction, installation and maintenance processes; reduction in use of rock-salt and related chemicals for snow and ice removal.

  • Conservation of water by reducing surface and subsurface runoff through preservation and use of dense vegetation and through water detention and retention areas; reduction in storm drains and attendant shunting of water off-site; reduction in impervious paving surfaces, increase in porous surfaces.

  • Conservation of soil primarily through minimal disturbance. Also through erosion control, retaining organic matter on site (grass clippings, chopped leaves), and reducing soil pollutants (salt, petroleum products, toxic chemicals, heavy metals….)

  • Rigorous protection of vegetation and soils during construction projects and routine maintenance using such elements as protective fencing to minimize soil compaction caused by heavy machinery, keeping soil covered, etc.

  • Education and interpretation of sustainable landscapes through the usage of identification labels and interpretive signage to foster human connections with the landscape and promote the understanding of natural systems.

  • Preferential use of local materials (stone and wood products, plants materials, etc.), renewable and recyclable materials and materials with small "life-cycle costs" (extraction, production, transport, utilization and disposal).

  • A Diversity of habitats, as appropriate to the area, to support diverse organisms and foster diverse human experiences.

  • A sustainable landscape is one which is ecologically healthy, economically viable and contributes to human cultural experience and the human good (education, aesthetic appreciation, sense of place, equal access, and, understanding of the human niche and the human role in natural systems).

    Sustainable Landscape Group
    Office of Sustainability Programs
    107 Nesmith Hall, University of New Hampshire
    Durham, NH 03824
    (603) 862-4088
    www.sustainableunh.unh.edu

    1 US Census Bureau, Census data summaries, 1950-2000.

    2 Thorne, Sarah and Dan Sundquist, New Hampshire’s Vanishing Forest: Conversion, Fragmentation and Parcelization in the Granite State, SPHNF 2001

    3 Thorne, Sarah, New Hampshire Everlasting, An Initiative to Conserve Our Quality-of-Life Working Proposal, SPNHF 2001


  • Contact Us: volunteers@portsmouthlistens.org
    404 Not Found

    404 Not Found


    nginx/0.7.67